Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelphikos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (talk) 10:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Adelphikos

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable single chapter club. No third party sources to demonstrate notability. Fails WP:N and WP:ORG requirements. Having notable members is not enough: notability is not inherited from related notable subjects.GrapedApe (talk) 03:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 27.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  18:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 11:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Grove City College. I really tried to find sources for this 100-year-old fraternity but was unsuccessful. --MelanieN (talk) 00:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Changing to Keep based on the improvements to the article by PhantomSteve. It's still a stub, but a referenced stub; and I think the great age of the organization (by American standards) pushes it over the line to "keep". --MelanieN (talk) 15:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - I have found some sources (although I acknowledge they are not the best, and the biog one for the "notable alumni" is a self-written blog), which I think just meets the criteria for inclusion. Not very notable, but I feel notable enough for inclusion. It would be good if more (probably off-line) sources could be found  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 12:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.