Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adenike Fajemirokun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Adenike Fajemirokun

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-executive director of a company. Questionable notability. Travelbird (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Notable enough to have her own profile on Bloomberg. Her speeches have been noted in businesstodayng.com and guardian.ng over the course of years. The Sun News did a profile of her and noted her as a "rising star." The Daily Trust did a profile of her when she was promoted to director at AIICO Pension Managers Limited. Lonehexagon (talk) 23:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * A female cooperate professional on the board of many leading companies seem like a big deal. HandsomeBoy (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. Dan arndt (talk) 01:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 04:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, appears to fail WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE] SportingFlyer (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2018 (UTC).
 * Delete: I'm not seeing compelling WP:SIGCOV to warrant keeping this. Marquardtika (talk) 04:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment This article doesn't need to pass WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE because it already satisfies WP:GNG. The topic "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Lonehexagon (talk) 08:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 19:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets GNG.  Business people is close, but add the significant coverage, we get to adequate indicia of notability.   Montanabw (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete most of the items which are being claimed towards making her notable are just routine aspects of someone's career. I mention this as the sourcing for the article all points back to these routine items. For example the lede tells us that "Head of Operational Risk of First Bank of Nigeria and joined the Dangote Group in 2014 and serves as the Group Chief Risk Officer." Ok, she had some higher positions in a company. So? Being on a board, as mentioned in the lede, is not notable. It's true that an article can contain non-notable items. However this one tried to make a case for notability by using sources that comment on entirely routine, non-notable job. activities. Any notability that exists here is extremely minor.104.163.148.25 (talk) 06:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG the sources are not strong enough. Most are either quotes, associated, routine coverage or puff pieces, or not very reliable, one even refers to her as him where they seem just to be repeating things said in the 1st person by the subject. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.