Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adeyemi series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 15:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Adeyemi series

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible original research. No clear references showing that this series is well-known under this name in the mathematical community. Two references are given - one is a vague mention of "Mathematics: Theory and Fun", the other is a link (maybe a typo?) to an unrelated webpage. No relevant Google results for "Adeyemi series" or Adeyemi "recurrence relation". (Note: PROD was removed by author, who then added the two references.) FreplySpang 02:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * delete Appears to be WP:OR. Problems with WP:RS. --- Taroaldo (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone has discovered the not-very-exciting fact that 13 &times; 7 &times; (10^n - 1) / 9 = 10^(n+1) - 10^n - 10. It makes pretty patterns in decimal notation but is otherwise pointless. It's not even in OEIS. And it's misnamed (should be sequence not series). The only reference I can find is an (unreliable) forum posting a month ago (not involving anyone named Adeyemi). I tried looking at "Integers with digits 0 and 1" by D. H. Lehmer et al. but that doesn't even mention this example. Delete as original research. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete there are references for the existence of the series, but that does not make it notable, also there is no evidence that it has a name. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 14:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator and David Eppstein. I am a bit surprised though that this gets so little attention in 13 (number). Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.