Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adgully


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. No merger target was ever identified. Star  Mississippi  00:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Adgully

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Advertising, Websites,  and India.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Subject has almost 200 uses as a reference source in enwiki. This stub article gives the context for those references. Clearly used as a secondary souce (X told Adgully, According to Adgully). And RSs quote Adgully's awards as notable. Would support merge to some suitable list page (Indian media/websites) Bogger (talk) 15:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Bogger, do you have a Merge target in mind that you might suggest? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment No merge target has been presented. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. My search didn't find any independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in any depth. It's true that some reliable sources occasionally cite Adgully or note in passing that someone received an award from them, but none of that is the sort of significant coverage that WP:NCORP, WP:NWEB, and the GNG require. Generally we don't merge/redirect to the sort of lists that Bogger is talking about (e.g. List of news websites in India) since they're written to include only notable subjects (see the first bullet point at WP:CSC), so in this case I think deletion is the best option. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.