Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhora: The Obscure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | spill the beans _ 21:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Adhora: The Obscure

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not yet released movie being promoted by its writer/director. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: The production still added in the article shows that the film's principal photography has commenced. Hence it does not violate WP:NFF. Writer having conflict of interest with the subject is not a reason for deletion. But notability of the films needs to be established to stay here. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the director's article - Not notable enough yet to have a separate one, but still it is hinted by quite a few sources (rarely reliable) that it will release. A redirect will also prevent further creation of the article before it becomes notable. (1, 2) Delete: None of the film's cast or crew seem notable. Best option is delete. Secret of success  06:25, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Director doesnt have any article here. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If the actor-turned-director Bhaskar Banerjee did have an article, a redirect would be a decent option.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:Not Yet (films). We do have sources speaking about its production process, but not enough yet for the topic to merit a separate article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above reasons. Also this blog gives completely different story of the film than the one written in the article. Is this original research? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 08:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Considering the director's name and the usename of the author, my sense is that the article may be more accurate than the blog. However, we'll know for sure when the film is actually released. Article creator now notified of this discussion, AND politely cautioned about possible COI.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:14, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.