Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adil Writer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 11:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Adil Writer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP. May be promotional. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep There are some references:, , , , . The problem is the articles itself, which need to be reworked. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - article is sourced now, easily passes GNG, added cats, external inks, still might be an orphan though. Could probably use some copyediting/expansion.-- Isaidnoway (talk)  21:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 02:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Some WP:BEFORE may have assisted. I am not criticizing the nominator, but a simple Google News search throws up sources like New Indian Express and The Hindu, apart from many others. Lourdes  04:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Subject meets WP:GNG. Anup   [Talk]  19:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep since the nomination, the article has now been sufficiently referenced, with more available on this page.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.