Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adjo Evonlah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 05:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Adjo Evonlah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It is too early. There is limited sources, mostly about her winning a contest for Black History Month earlier this week. Her CEO status was only a one or two line mention. Postcard Cathy (talk) 23:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Postcard Cathy (talk) 23:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Delete: Way too soon. As a BLP there just is not enough encyclopedic notability. Otr500 (talk) 01:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a textbook case of someone being non-notable. Lots of buzz words no substance.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't appear to pass GNG. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG, WP:MILL, WP:BLP1E, and WP:SIGCOV. Like many high-schoolers, she invented something, she got to shadow a city councilman for a day, and she won a contest for Black History Month. Good for her. She's not yet notable, and the total lack of coverage after each mention shows it. Bearian (talk) 13:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.