Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adjudication of the Bright and Morning Star versus Lucifer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Adjudication of the Bright and Morning Star versus Lucifer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I've been following this new article for several days, but the editors keep adding things which do not address the tags. To me, this article reads like in-universe propaganda for the UFO religion Urantia, and does not make any claim why this particular section is significant or notable using reliable 3rd party sources. Therefore, I'm nominating it for deletion. AstroCog (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of wp:notability.   No references except self references.   Plus the writing here is not even attempting to be an explanatory article.   Just a repetition of internal writings / preachings for the cult or religion or organization that wrote the material.  North8000 (talk) 23:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be an attempt to summarize a concept from a religious tome, referencing only the book itself. Fails notability for lack of independent, secondary sources on this concept. And rather than a neutral description of the concept, its purpose would seem to be to explain the concept to an acolyte of the religion, thus failing WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.