Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Adman
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Spam article about a spam website. See also Articles for deletion/Adman -- it appears that nomination was never closed. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of third-party sources; all sources are either from the company or its parent company Phaistos Networks. --McGeddon (talk) 16:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Promotional article created by the company in question - no reliable sourcing to be found. Nwlaw63 (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: No indication of notability. SL93 (talk) 00:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.