Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative Services Organization


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Administrative Services Organization

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems a little used trade name or trademark, not a generally used term: the refs (two of which are identical) are mostly promotional, the few google hits the same. Written like an advert though that could be fixed if better sources were found. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 17:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * We didn't intend to violate any Wikipedia rules. The term ASO is broadly known in the payroll and employee benefits industry.  I agree that more editing is a great idea. The use of duplicate articles was, in fact, an error. The first of which was never intended for submission and should be deleted. The use of the "Administrative Services Organization" article would help define a sometimes confusing or misused term. The article has been revised and will be revised further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford.joe.j (talk • contribs) 13:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 18:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into Professional employer organization, since it clearly has no independent existence. – Smyth\talk 16:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.