Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adnan Januzaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 12:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Adnan Januzaj

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mistakenly contested PROD. This player fails all known notability guidelines, particularly WP:NFOOTY, which states that footballers only become automatically notable if they have played in a competitive, first-team match for a professional club. Januzaj was selected as a substitute against West Brom on Sunday, but that is not enough. – PeeJay 23:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – PeeJay 00:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I note that in WP:NFOOTY it says "Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above" which means that his selection for Belgium u-19s is inadequate for keeping and whilst I think he will probably become notable in the future, at the moment he simply does not meet the GNG.-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 11:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep/Comment - WP:NFOOTY does not clearly define what qualifies an "appearance". I believe him being on the bench against WBA can be considered as a "Player who has appeared in a fully professional league." Note the absence of the word "match" or "game" - were it to read "Players who have...appeared in a match/game in a fully professinal league...", it would suggest unused subs not being counted. Muzher (talk • contribs) 14:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment see "A player who signs for a domestic team but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable. ". This says that if they did not play, they are not notable.-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 14:44, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 18:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Just being on the bench doesn't cut it.  Still fails WP:NFOOTBALL and also fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – Michael (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there any chance that, for once in an AfD about a footballer, any of those editors claiming WP:GNG failure could provide the analysis of the sources found by the spoon-fed Google News search that led to that conclusion? Phil Bridger (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. I see nothing but standard coverage in newspapers like the Daily Mail and The Independent. Argyle 4 Life  talk  06:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.