Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Fruchthändler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Discounting the SPIs, there is still no consensus to delete. Nakon 07:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Adolf Fruchthändler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

See No original research! --Norepy (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. While I don't see an overabundance of cited sources, I certainly don't see evidence of original research. —C.Fred (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Approximately eleven million people were killed in the Holocaust. While their fates all were tragical, most of them are not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia with separate biographies. Fruchthändler appears to fail both WP:VICTIM and WP:ONEEVENT. P. S. Burton  (talk)  18:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage, fails WP:NBIO. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 19:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication of notability in article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep this is no original research, so keep it--Das-Geheimnis-der-Sphinx (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Fruchthändler was featured extensively in Profil, Austria's equivalent to Time (magazine).--Meister und Margarita (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep No original research noted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpencils (talk • contribs) 12:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as Burton expressed above. Neutralitytalk 23:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Burton . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikepetola (talk • contribs) 07:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of notability whatsoever in the article. As many as 80 million died during WWII, we don't have biographies on all of them, that would make Wikipedia into something quite different from an encyclopedia. (Not to mention all those other people who died in the numerous other atrocities, genocides and conflicts in the 20th century and before, like the 10 million dead in Belgian Congo for example; should we have 10 million biographies for them too, with content like "Dikembe was a carpenter from the Congo, who was killed by the Belgians. He enjoyed music and telling stories, and was liked by everyone in his village, and was sorely missed by his wife"?). Tadeusz Nowak (talk) 08:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Heck, I'd support a speedy delete on grounds that no assertion of notability is made.  Nha Trang  Allons! 17:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.