Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Hitler's inspection of the German Workers' Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler's inspection of the German Workers' Party
No reason to be a separate article. Should be deleted and/or merged with Adolf Hitler. JW1805 (Talk) 02:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep - I found the relevant section here Adolf_Hitler which does not go in to enough detail. This article Adolf Hitler's inspection of the German Workers' Party goes in to much more detail about it, and hence is a natural expansion from the main article.  It is an important part of his rise to power, since it is when and how he went from being just a member of the army to being someone of importance.  This is not explored enough in the main article, yet it is here.  I think that this is very well written (who put in the cleanup tags???) and could be one of the 50 or so sub-articles in Category:Adolf_Hitler that describe different important elements.  I see absolutely no reason at all to delete this historically relevant section.  The only possible alternative could be a merge in to an article that is already far too big and already has similar sub sections. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 03:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, tentatively. The content is interseting, the Hitler article is long. On the other hand, the title is awkward. Tom Harrison (talk) 03:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Where else could we merge it? - CorbinSimpson 04:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Zordrac and Tom Harrison. I've changed the bold quotes to blockquotes, and removed the cleanup tag.
 * Keep per above. This is unmergeable. Does need some sources, though. Please make sure it's linked in the section of the main Hitler article mentioned above. - Mgm|(talk) 09:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep needs work and good links from related articles. -- MisterHand 17:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep no brainer for me...Jcuk 19:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if renamed. The title is misleading. The article should be leaf of main article and wikifying would help. Pavel Vozenilek 03:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.