Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolfo Fernández Sainz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus and defaulting to keep. There have been a series of related AFDs on other Black Spring prisoners, and they all have a similar result. I do find the argument set forth by the "keep" side more well-thought out, since they relate to the sourcing and international attention, rather than a quick reference to a policy. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Adolfo Fernández Sainz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability tied to just one event. Damiens .rf 15:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E.  Grsz 11  15:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Grsz11, Lord Spongefrog,  (I am the Czar of all Russias!)  19:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Black Spring (Cuba) as a plausable search term.  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 09:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG's analysis. The fact that a large group of individuals is associated with a particular event does not mean that is the only event relating to ther notability, and prisoners of conscience, especially those recognized by Amnesty International, typically have generated significant nontrivial coverage for their activities. The article mentions notable recognition from the highly notable PEN organization, making the BLP1E rationale plainly invalid. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or (less ideally) merge. Plenty of sources and sources cover a wide range of time periods.  This is like arguing that an author is only notable for writing a book.  Hobit (talk) 04:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz UltraMagnusspeak 10:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.