Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adreno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Adreno

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating this article on behalf of an editor with a potential conflict of interest, per a request on my talk page. The rationale is as follows: While quality source material exists in engineering trades such as Electronic Engineering Times and Electronic Design News, in none of these sources is Adreno the subject'' of the article as required by GNG. Rather the sources are about Snapdragon (system on chip), which Adreno is a component of and where content about Adreno would be better suited. I suggest an AfD, rather than Merge, because most of the material on the Adreno page is not appropriate for Wikipedia (original research, extensive spec-sheets, crystal ball, etc.) such that practically speaking the content itself should be removed, rather than moved to a different page.'' § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep&mdash;Googling Adreno review brings up hits to Anandtech, Tom's Hardware and NotebookCheck. FRF has a good point that articles focusing on the Snapdragon processor are unlikely to establish the notability of the GPU it uses.  These articles, though, are focused on the GPU performance, and provide a sufficient foundation on which to build a decent article.  I see that the Notebook Check cite has pointers to reviews of older Adreno models; I suspect the same will be true for other hardware enthusiast sites.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 04:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I think it is about "I don't like it" and I don't see any reason to delete this useful article. -- Faramarz ♚♔♚ 10:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 06:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. GeForce, AMD Radeon and related articles are also "full of extensive spec-sheets" - do we have to delete them as well? The article probably needs better sources, but I would refrain from removing the specs until there is a sustainable indication that they are outright erroneous. --128.72.10.182 (talk) 07:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.