Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adri Jovin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. conssensus  DGG ( talk ) 05:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Adri Jovin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF. Only an assistant professor. scope_creep (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON. I'm not particularly concerned about the academic rank (it's suggestive that someone might not be notable, but not definitive of whether they actually are) but his citations are too low to demonstrate the impact necessary for WP:PROF and nothing else in the article rises to the level of notability. Writing a self-published textbook certainly doesn't count for much, and neither do his connections to industry. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as the subject does not pass WP:PROF. Most non-academic references in the article are primary, and therefore not good enough to pass WP:GNG. — Stringy Acid (talk) 16:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Stringy Acid (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nowhere near to passing WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete - there is hardly anything found from searches. There are some published articles, but not a lot, in google scholar. I wondered if the Tamil angle might be worth exploring, but I'm not finding anything - even on his webpage to indicate notability or get into specific about what he's doing with Tamil language/technology and TechnicalTamil.com (seems to be down). This is perhaps a case of TOOSOON.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.