Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Camilleri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  11:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Adrian Camilleri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Simply not notable. Small-time fraud convict. The only reason he made the news is he dated model Miranda Kerr. So, either he's worth a footnote in her "personal life section" and perhaps a redirect, or better, nothing at all. Scott Mac 23:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not even BLP1E as far as the crime itself is concerned. The connection to a "famous person" is a very weak basis to hang a BLP on for notability. Collect (talk) 23:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:BLP1E. Tijfo098 (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete — per Tijfo. Redirect would be undue; mentioning his conviction in someone else's article sounds like a dash of undue and a dash of flea topic to me. JFHJr (㊟) 12:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Except it is already there.--Scott Mac 21:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank goodness we're not bound by what's in other Wiki articles. Its existence in a publicly edited webpage such as this doesn't mean a hill of beans. A redirect would be undue for both parties; he's an alleged ex, she's an aleged ex, and his conviction is neither something that makes him notable, nor anything that is objectively noteworthy in an encyclopedic WP:BLP containing details of lasting biographical significance. JFHJr (㊟) 00:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep After all, she was engaged to him at the time according to one of the references. TheAustralian.com, if not then a Redirect at least. Sydneystriker (talk) 10:17, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Being allegedly "engaged" to a celebrity doesn't make you notable?--Scott Mac 10:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - The fact that in one of the references it states that Miranda Kerr and her mother, Therese was affected by the fraud makes it worth keeping. Crackingstack (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Information about psychological distress to a celebrity belongs on the celebrity's bio (if at all).--Scott Mac 10:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Its insufficient and as the incident is mentioned in Miranda Kerr's Bio, then it should be a redirected and no more. Pigsbiy66 (talk) 11:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete He's not famous nor notable, so if not a redirect then delete. Easthamboy (talk) 10:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.