Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Ganjian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Adrian Ganjian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played in a fully professional league and does not have enough significant coverage to pass WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Echoing all of the above and also the BLPPROD never should've been removed as not a single source so much as mentions him (and one is a dead link.) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  09:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - way WP:TOOSOON, almost no footballer meets WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG at the tender age or 15. Article can easily be recreated when the subject meets the qulifications listed above. Good day Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 17:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG at this time Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.