Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Molder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Adrian Molder

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources or indication of notability - he was a minor party candidate, so it claims, but for what office? the weasel words have saved it from speedy but now let's see the sources showing notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:57, 19 December 2008 (UTC) ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--I also don't know what office, but he finished fourth (and last). Drmies (talk) 03:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Running for office once is not enough.
 * Delete: This is not an encyclopaedia entry, it is merely a statement. There is lack of notability, references and simply is void of all current importance. I assume that later, when the individual becomes elected to a major position and has numerous independent sources a entry could be re-entered. Royalhistorian (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, he ran in Scarborough—Agincourt. But that doesn't make him notable. Delete; this actually could have been speedied as an A7, by the way. Oh, and check out what happens when you read the creator's username backwards: User:Redlom. That's a dead cert WP:COI. Bearcat (talk) 07:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WP:POLITICIAN is pretty clear on unsuccessful political candidates who have no other claim to notability.  freshacconci  talk talk  15:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.