Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Oliver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  17:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Adrian Oliver

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails to establish notability. Nothing special or noteworthy about this college basketball player that would pass even the most liberal GNG. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - though he may be notable as a player in a pro league somewhere - I don't really know. If someone wanted to verify that, add it to the article and source it then he's probably notable.  As is, though, he doesn't meet the bar for college athlete notability.  Rikster2 (talk) 14:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The most notable award he received was one awarded weekly, which does not meet the notability standard. [tk]   XANDERLIPTAK  15:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

He is projected to be first team all wac —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rameelraymundo (talk • contribs) 18:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * First, that's WP:CRYSTAL. Secondly, being a first team all-conference player doesn't pass notability requirements. If he ends up being the WAC Player of the Year, then he would. But, since he hasn't been named the POY, nor will we know who is going to be named the POY until it happens next March, this article needs to be deleted. If he becomes the POY, then it can get re-created at that time. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.