Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Van Oyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  00:17, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Adrian Van Oyen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article CSD'd twice - for promotion and then for importance. Declined and Afd suggested. Thus nominating for notability even though there are links to him Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

— Note to closing admin: Ungnome (talk • contribs) appears to have a close connection with the subject being discussed.
 * He is quite popular on youtube. VitalyzdTv has his own page on wikipedia and he is also a famous youtuber. I think 30 million views is a noble achievement to deserve a wiki page no? Ungnome (talk) 10:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete-What? This is wikipedia UGnome :) and Plenty of people can get 30 million views,It's like deleting PSY's Article because of to many views,Just take Skydoesminecraft. He Dosen't need a Wikipedia article and is immensely popular. Radioactiveplayful (talk) 16:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Radioactiveplayful


 * Weak keep Two full-length news articles on the subject listed in article, a copy of the Brisbane Times article here, a lengthy mention here, and short pieces about him here, here, here and here. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, good secondary source coverage, within scope of WP:COMEDY and WP:INTERNET. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.