Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriana Alberti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 02:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Adriana Alberti

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Deprodded and moved here; I am unsure whether she is notable--it might depend on whether the many publications listed as books are published books, or just administrative reports. It also needs better sources.  DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- ( X!  ·  talk )  · @131  · 02:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Disclosure: I was the prodder here. Gnews didn't turn up much in the way of significant coverage, Gscholar hits give an h-index of 3 or so, once you factor out a biologist of the same name. I conclude fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG - this seems to be an experienced but not particularly noted UN functionary-scholar. Ray  Talk 02:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —John Z (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I have to go with RayAYang here. The bacterial biologist has more hits, and the one that seem to be Adriana Alberti top out at 3 citations, and just a few of those.  There is one book that she contributed a chapter to with 20 citations, but those seem to be to the book as a whole, not to her chapter.  This feels like just below threshold, unless some of her UN reports were themselves subject to broader public discussion, which might nudge it to the keep side.  LotLE × talk  08:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, but Lulu is right, the UN reports could make her notable. The problem is, they are mentioned in just a few foreign-language news articles, so I do not think she is quite notable. MiRroar (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 06:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.