Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianna Lynn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Adrianna Lynn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Scene awards no longer count so now fails pornbio as well as gng Spartaz Humbug! 22:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep as meets PORNBIO & GNG, I should point out this !vote has absolutely nothing to do with looks!. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * In other words - this is a HOTTIE vote and should be discarded. Spartaz Humbug! 09:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Well I think it'd be extremely worrying if an admin didn't disregard it although it'd be nice if it wasn't for once . – Davey 2010 Talk 13:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom's accurate assessment and the lack of policy-based argu,emts for retention. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   08:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC) *Delete per nom's accurate assessment. Just another inasequately sourced, promotionally toned BLP. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete My sweeps did not turn up much, although one of the sources seems headed in the gng direction.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * - You've already !voted above - Don't worry it happens to us all . – Davey 2010 Talk 14:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.