Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianna So


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 15:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Adrianna So

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to pass WP:NACTOR; her most well-known role is in a YouTube series and her other roles appear to be fairly small parts. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – per nom. This was moved to draftspace for development and then moved back to mainspace without much in the way of improvement. A redirect in draftspace prevented return. Eagleash (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It actually wasn't the redirect that prompted me to take it to AfD; typically if I catch a unilateral move to mainspace after a page has been draftified at least once, I send it to AfD rather than draftifying a second time. It's better to just take care of the problem via discussion rather than a move war; if the creator wants to actually work on expanding the article to be mainspace worthy, they can easily come here and argue for it to be kept or draftified for further development. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought about bringing it here myself but didn't really have the time and decided it was better, as is my wont, for the creator to be given the opportunity to develop it as a draft; with some 'mentoring', including the advice that it will likely be deleted if it is again moved out of process. Eagleash (talk) 21:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Article is cleaned up a bit, a few reliable sources are added there. The article is good enough to meet WP:NACTOR. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. I note there are many possible sources. Bearian (talk) 20:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.