Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianni Zanatta Alarcón


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – czar   20:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Adrianni Zanatta Alarcón

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

none of this shows notability by WP:PROF or otherwise  DGG ( talk ) 19:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. "References" are single line listings of the individual or do not mention the individual.  red dogsix (talk) 20:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * There's but I don't know about its reputation –  czar   20:06, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:56, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. His Google scholar profile shows zero citations, indicating that he does not pass WP:PROF, and his other academic accomplishments also do not rise to the level of any of the other WP:PROF criteria. There may be a bit of a WP:OWN problem here as well as the article problems: has re-created the article after it was deleted by a PROD (valid, but out of process), reverted the addition of valid maintenance tags to the article, and reverted the removal of useless cruft (such as vanity-scam "who's who" listings and an indiscriminate listing of all of the subject's patents). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete While google scholar profiles might not be good to establish notability, those with 0 citations are not anywhere near notable for contributions to an academic field. If I followed the article right this man is currently working on a masters degree. I see nothing even remotrely notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.