Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adriatica McKinney, Texas (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  05:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Adriatica McKinney, Texas
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of passing WP:GNG. Also appears to be a recreation of previously deleted material... Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This article is a recreation of a previously deleted title, yet the content is different. This page may not pass WP:GNG regardless, but it is not eligible for WP:G4. Garchy (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * is it possible for you to restore the deleted content for us non-admins to view? Perhaps to the talk page of the article or a draft space? Would be helpful for comparison. -- Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What would be the point? IIRC there was nothing salvageable in the previous version, and an admin has already declined a G4 nomination. VQuakr (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Leaning towards delete - the "Time Money" bit on Youtube isn't an interview, it's just a paid spot of the creator plugging his product. That leaves several cites to D Magazine, which is probably too local in coverage to pass the intellectual independence requirement of the GNG. That leaves a different and very short news blurb from 2009 and as noted in the last AfD, the Croatian source is mostly quotes of press releases. VQuakr (talk) 04:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.