Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrienne Arieff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. slakr \ talk / 01:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Adrienne Arieff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:AUTHOR. References are not independent of the subject. Bisswajit  08:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources of this author and her book. This article covers both. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - can anybody get behind the paywall at here? Bearian (talk) 17:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  02:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete self promotional material is not suitable for writing a wikipedia article. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY, based on a cite from USA Today and other reliable sources added after I first looked at the article. The peppy tone can be fixed. Bearian (talk) 20:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. To the extent subject received coverage in reliable sources it appears to be WP:ONEEVENT, though book may be notable and general subject is for sure notable. -- Pink Bull  16:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Commercial surrogacy in India, not independently notable; however, book publicised India as a place of commercial surrogacy. --Bejnar (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.