Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult surrealism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete - G3 (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Adult surrealism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It looks like this genre of art limits itself currently to one artist, Jonathan Osman/sunderlandartstuden, and hasn't received much attention. I heave found nothing, and I think this genre should be out of the scope of Wikipedia, per WP:MADEUP. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Litho  derm  01:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only is this unsourced it's incoherent. I have no idea what the article creator is attempting to say. In any case, there is no indication of notability here.  freshacconci  talk talk  02:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 02:08, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unsourced, not notable, original research, non-existant art movement...Modernist (talk) 04:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.