Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advance Wars By Web (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, no reliable sources were found.. —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) 21:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Advance Wars By Web (second nomination)

 * — (View AfD)

The game was already deleted a while ago but I don't know if the content is similar. Either way, the current article is not verifiable through reliable sources and doesn't meet WP:WEB. Nothing from Google Wafulz 03:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I like how you can say "Nothing from google" when when I do a search it comes up with "Results 1 - 10 of about 38,400 for "Advance Wars by Web". (0.25 seconds)" Some of the fun links I found from it: I'm sorry but I'm a bit new to this, are you saying despite having over 38,000 results on google and approximately 32,000 registered users on the website doesn't make it "notable"? Painezor 10:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * http://www.wayoftherodent.com/backissues/71cover.htm
 * http://www.racketboy.com/retro/2006/01/play-advance-wars-against-people.html
 * Comment if you look at WP:RS you'll see wikipedia doesn't give blogs much credit at all. Since anyone can trivially write and publish a blog entry blogs usually don't meet WP:RS. So you should argue that these aren't blogs and show us evidence they are reputable sources, then integrate them into the article. --Quirex 22:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no good reason to delete an article about a popular website like this. - MTC 15:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. By "nothing from Google" I meant I couldn't find multiple non-trivial independent sources. I never once mentioned notability. The two links you've provided look to be minor gaming sites- one doesn't even have information, it just basically says "this is my favourite game" in a blurb. --Wafulz 18:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless someone is going to provide some non-trivial references, WP:WEB is a good reason. The second URL above, incidentally, implies copyright violation - if correct, the link should be removed even if the article is not. CiaranG 18:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. Xiner (talk, email) 20:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:WEB. Eusebeus 13:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep ... as for failing WP:WEB I direct you to the 38,000 :). Still having a look around for the WP:RS thingy, it would help if I had a clue. Painezor 21:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment what part of WP:WEB does it pass? I can find no media mentions, and no reliable secondary sources. You need 2 or more reliable secondary sources to pass WP:WEB or you need 1 notable web award or someone has to include this pages content elsewhere. Perhaps you want to try WP:SOFTWARE. Can you find any non-blog coverage of the game? --Quirex 22:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced... Addhoc 23:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.