Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn by original nominator. Non-admin close. JDDJS (talk) 16:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Does not appear to be notable to me. JDDJS (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It is now clear to me that this article is in fact notable, so I withdraw my nomination. JDDJS (talk) 16:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Discussed by the Federation of American Scientists here, by the US Government Accountability Office here (though that may be considered a primary source), the RAND Corporation talks about it in one of their publications here. There's not a lot but I think there's enough to scratch passed WP:GNG.  Also, I imagine as an offical government "office" or whatever that it should be considered inherently notable (I don't know if policy addresses this).   S Æ don talk 21:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep needs some examples of programs adding to it. I'll do that. Greglocock (talk) 00:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - This topic appears to pass WP:GNG, per:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 07:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 07:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 07:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 07:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 07:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep- Enough valid sourcing for it to be an article--MOLEY (talk) 11:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.