Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Integrated Composite Tail Cone (ADVITAC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Advanced Integrated Composite Tail Cone (ADVITAC)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article is a advertisement obviously. And probably a hoax. MisterWiki  talk   contribs  19:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. -- MisterWiki  talk   contribs  19:15, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, FWIW, I don't think it's a hoax. Here's an article about it, and it seems like a EU-style project. I'm not !voting one way or the other yet, however. tedder (talk) 19:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Not enough important. -- MisterWiki  talk   contribs  19:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is one of a fair number of EU sponsored research projects; there's been offsite advice about how everyone involved in them can create a Wikipedia page for each, without regard to whether they are notable or not.  Most of these are crystal ball material, explaining what each of them hopes to achieve.  We all know about hope, unfortunately.  This one sounds more concrete and interesting than some of the others, but as far as I can tell it's still rather pie in the sky at this point. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as it is basically crystal ball gazing and sounds like part of a state sponsored, coordinated effort to vandalize Wikipedia. Handschuh-talk to me 11:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.