Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Skin Fitness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Advanced Skin Fitness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for Non notable dermatology clinic. Perhaps Vampire facelift is notable, but they didn't invent it; the CBS ref is to the local station in the agency's own city.All other refs are similarly local.  DGG ( talk ) 00:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or Stubify, I can see DGG's point regarding the non-globally importance of the subject. I don't see how in-depth sources don't pass GNG because they're not the national news if they're still network sources, but perhaps that's just a matter of opinion. I stopped writing on cosmetic surgery things like this years ago as notability always seems to be tricky with them. Easier to focus on other kinds of scientists/physicians that have a higher national profile. Jeremy112233 ( Lettuce-jibber-jabber? ) 15:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The "reliable source" coverage is the type of local small business promotional fluff generated by press releases or 21st century equivalents. None of it amounts to a hill of beans, in my opinion. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:49, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As a local, I can say this is unlikely solidly notable yet and my searches found nothing convincingly better. Delete at best and restart later if better, SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.