Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced academy of indore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Indore. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Advanced academy of indore

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sounds like an ad to the school, article doesn't show notability. Guy0307 (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Very strong delete. About one sentence for the article, and shows absolutely no sign of NPOV. -Axmann8  ( Talk )  07:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Indore for the moment. The only sites that have anything on this are wikipedia and our mirrors.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  08:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - surely a candidate for speedy per WP:CSD? Coldmachine Talk 08:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 *  Delete : I'm going to say go for deletion per: WP:SCH, as opposed to speedy deletion due to "advertising" SpitfireTally-ho! 09:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect: Actually, a redirect with no merge would be better, as per Marshall, SpitfireTally-ho! 09:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment -- The reason I'm emphasising redirect rather than deletion is because then, an encyclopaedic article on this topic could be written without having to jump through bureaucratic hoops like DRV. A sourced, well-researched article on the Advanced Academy of Indore strikes me as the kind of thing Wikipedia would want to include without such obstacles.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  14:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If that was the case we'd have no need to delete the article, if the subject is notable there is no grounds for deletion, just for a rewrite. But such a thing could never happen as it doesn't seem to be discussed in any sources except us and mirrors, as someone says.  Is it known under a slightly different name?  If an encyclopedic article can be made, we can leave it as is until we write it (like tomorrow) or stick some reliable sources in it.  S Marshall, I can see your reasoning but if an article can be made, we can make it now, if any of us can be bothered, and if this is remotely notable under some variation of the name. Sticky Parkin 15:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't agree that "If an article can be made, we can make it now". There aren't sources online at the moment (or at least, none that google can find).  But there may be lemon-soaked paper napkins sources in future.  :)  Or perhaps on paper, that someone more local to Indore could find.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  15:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is that racist lol? Ah ok I get your point. Maybe in the distant future. I managed to vaguely find this ref'ed outside wiki but it doesn't seem to be notable. Sticky Parkin 15:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Indore is a sensible option. TerriersFan (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.