Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced axis and allies

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect to Axis and Allies. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 23:21, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)

Advanced axis and allies
A game that is still in the design stage. Unreleased products are not encyclopedic. --Lee Hunter 00:50, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Axis and Allies.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 04:49, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Redirect. --Ray Radlein 05:11, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, and also redirect the correctly capitalized version of AA&A. Radiant! 13:10, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or (weak vote) redirect to Axis and Allies. I'm a gamer and an occasional A&A player, but an unreleased product is never encyclopedic (not even Microsoft Longhorn), and an "advanced" variant of a medium-popular game wouldn't have enough noteworthiness for its own article even if it existed and had a bit of its own localized subhobby popularity.  Barno 16:37, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I would prefer delete. Wikipedia ought not to be in the business of making predictions about future events.  However, I also understand the argument for redirect to keep it from reappearing.  Rossami (talk) 22:01, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect --Theo (Talk) 23:37, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.