Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advances in Renal Cancer Journalists' Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Advances in Renal Cancer Journalists' Award

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Recently established award. No independent sources establishing notability. Has been prodded before (and was deprodded by an editor with only that single edit), but no improvement forthcoming. Crusio (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. I still would like to object the deletion. The article "Advances in Renal Cancer Journalists' Award" describes the award as well as the conditions of participation. It´s descriptive and not commercial. The award exists since 2008 and is regularly announced every year. Like all the other Wikipedia-articles about journalism awards it is of interest for (medical) journalists and users that are generally interested in kidney cancer and (journalism) awards. I also added another secondary source (European Urology Today). If there´s something else I can do to keep this entry, please tell me what it is. Claudia MS (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC) — Claudia MS (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment The added reference, does not in my opinion satisfy the requirements ofWP:GNG, I'm afraid. --Crusio (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The award does not appear to have attracted enough mainstream attention to qualify as WP:NOTABLE. The listed references mostly appear to be press releases or otherwise self-referential on the part of the sponsor, Bayer Healthcare. --MelanieN (talk) 03:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.