Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advantage Real Estate Professionals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete a7, website/company with no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Advantage Real Estate Professionals

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This real estate agencies article claims several sources about the subject, but I couldn't find any. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article was only created today, so it might have been better to wait a few days before putting it up for AfD. However, the article currently has no sources and after looking around for a bit I could not come up with anything substantive. GoogleNews search gives only 2 hits but both appear to be false positives. The edit summary (see the history log above) used to create the article was misleading: "Changed from looking like an advertisement". Come again? Makes it sound more like a WP:ADVERT case. Nsk92 (talk) 19:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete yet again, and salt. This has already been speedied twice as blatant advertising (maybe that's the reason for the AfD), and the original author has been indefinitely blocked because the user name closely mimicked the name of the subject company. The article is shorter, but it is patently clear that the purpose of the article is blatant advertising, and the company is not notable to boot. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy delete - blatant advertising Napsterbater (talk) 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, without salt (I'm on a low-sodium diet) Great advertising, but not an article. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I may disagree about the "salt," but the low-sodium thing gave me a much-needed chuckle. Thanks. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.