Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure Parks Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Missvain (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Adventure Parks Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Company that fails WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Prod declined by User:DGG with "perhaps merge the parks here, or else redirect". Not sure what you want to merge, and redirect where? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:18, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. and merge articles for the two individual parks to this article for the group.  DGG ( talk ) 18:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Considering the sorry state of the subarticles, I am not sure how this would help. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I take the opposite view of DGG above. I believe that as topics, the parks are notable and therefore those articles should remain. Whereas this company is not notable in its own right so it should be deleted. If there are guidelines that suggest the opposite I'll change my mind.  HighKing++ 12:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm inclined to agree with HighKing as to notability, on INHERITED grounds. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.