Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure World Warsaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Adventure World Warsaw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Proposed theme park. Prod text was "Missing reliable references, failing to indicate notability". Removed by the creator, I don't feel that anything has been addressed. Still a crystal ballish future commercial project of no present notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ( t  •  c ) 02:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - could easily be recreated if it ever gets built. Until then, we are not a Crystal Ball--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 08:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:CRYSTAL is about "unverifiable speculation". Crystal is not a guideline to disallow anticipated events but rather to ensure "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. Mkdw talk 20:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The project itself is more interesting than the tourist facilities. The construction started on July 21 2012. The announcement of problems in Poland and problems with corruption made a loss for the IMTECH shareholders of 1 Billion Euro in one single day . 94.220.176.18 (talk) 09:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not a Future Theme Park from the Future, it is a Present Construction Site in the Present, and the tone of the article seems to be about what's being currently constructed.  Listmeister (talk) 13:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep – While the article clearly needs some work, it currently contains reliable references such as this one which reinforce the article's content as being accurate. There is even an official web site that was removed from the article at some point that should be reinstated. The argument against keeping it is too broad at this point. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Construction is verified - WP:CRYSTAL does not exclude anticipated events by reliable sources: "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable". In conducting WP:BEFORE, it's quite apparent the building of the park has received widespread and international coverage. About four pages of news stories. Mkdw talk 21:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets Wikipedia's threshold of notability. Source examples:, , . Northamerica1000(talk) 11:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.