Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventurer's Kit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Adventurer&

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spam article on an unreleased game for which the Kickstarter hasn't even gone live. Article written by the designer. This should be an easy A7/G11 speedy deletion, but taking to AfD for procedural reasons--after the author himself removed the speedy (quickly reverted) and offered a WP:OTHERSTUFF defense on the talk page, an "independent" editor with no other edits removed the speedy tag without explanation or improvement. -- Finngall  talk  13:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    14:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete no apparent sources of note. Hobit (talk) 05:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. While there are plans to create this game, the game does not exist at this point in time and there's really no actual coverage of this proposed game in places Wikipedia would consider reliable or in-depth. The company itself may be notable - a Parent's Choice Award can be an indication of notability - but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by the company itself and we need to be able to establish that the product is notable now. It's fairly difficult for games to establish notability prior to their release, as you have to have a lot of coverage to accomplish this. I'm aware that most RS won't cover pre-release games unless they're done by exceptionally well known (read, mainstream) companies, but the coverage is still a requirement and Wikipedia is not here to make up the difference. I have no problem with this getting resubmitted once the game hits the streets and gains more coverage, but I'd recommend that this go through AfC given that the main contributor (and the person most likely to recreate it) has a WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.