Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advitya (Assamese film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Advitya (Assamese film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM. All coverage referenced in the article is based on either releases by, or 'interviews' with, the director. "A feature film that has begun shooting but not been released ... should generally not have their own article" (WP:NFF). By the director's own admission there are production and budget issues. The outcome of the previous AfD for this film was delete. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2019 (UTC)


 * This should not be the only cause of deletion. Read the report again and you can see that he also stated that they have managed everything. A budget of a film should not determine if it deserves to be on wikipedia. The official teaser has come out on June 20/2019. Many other news articles say that the film is scheduled for an early 2020 release. You can not delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpp1111 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep this source was written since the last AfD and would appear to both 1) comprise significant coverage 2) make specific claims attesting to the historic nature of the film (first superhero film in Assamese cinema). I don't think the sources currently cited add up to GNG yet, but I think we can assume WP:NPOSSIBLE in this case. signed,Rosguill talk 19:15, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:18, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The links in the ref section proves the notability for this article and so I request to approve the article and remove the Afd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpp1111 (talk)
 * We know you think the film meets the criteria, but it is up to other, independent editors to decide by WP:consensus. You can help by putting forward arguments that show specifically how one or more references meet the criteria. I think time will tell whether this becomes a notable film. If, once it has been released, it proves to be a box office success and many people such as newspaper journalists write about it then that will be the time for an encyclopedia article about it, not now. At the moment, all we have is the director trying to promote it before it is release. See WP:NYF. Curb Safe Charmer (talk)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 03:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.