Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advocates for Awareness of Watchtower Abuses : AAWA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. I see no reason to let this linger. Whatever reliable sources there are don't discuss (linked ones) or seem to discuss (offline ones) the actual topic--this organization. The laundry list of "media coverage" pertains to the subject of the subject's activism, not, from spot checks, to the subject. In addition, the text is irredeemably not-neutral, combing essay-style OR with promotion. Drmies (talk) 05:46, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Advocates for Awareness of Watchtower Abuses : AAWA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Article contains a long list of references but they do not reference this organisation Hack (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:39, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete A well-intentioned attempt to document the existence of the organization, however there is no significant coverage whatsoever other than self-generated content and some videos. Certainly no news hits at all. Which makes sense given that it was founded only this year. A case of WP:TOOSOON perhaps, but fails WP:ORG for now. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:05, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This will be the third time the article has been deleted under different names. The first two were Speedy Deletions. In addition to what FreeRangeFrog said, the article is highly promotional, has copyright violations (copied from http://aawa.co/mission-statement/) and has major COI issues.  While some of these issues can be overcome, lack of significant coverage cannot. Bgwhite (talk) 07:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.