Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aequeosalinocalcalinoceraceoaluminosocupreovitriolic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. A merger always results in a redirect (to preserve page history). Petros471 18:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Aequeosalinocalcalinoceraceoaluminosocupreovitriolic
Dictionary definition Stlemur 22:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge to Wiktionary.--Edtalk c E  22:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as patent nonsense. Gazpacho 23:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Longest word in English and delete (or redirect because if anybody types that in they deserve to get to a page) - Yomangani talk 23:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge —  and I guess redirect, even though it seems unlikely anyone would type this. JChap2007 03:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This is a very notable word - more than just dictionary definition. There are so few of these recognised "longest" words; it's not as if there are hundreds of articles made for them. A claimant to the longest word in the English language has a high degree of notability. At the moment it's a stub, yes, but I am sure it can be expanded to include the exact circumstances under which the word was first used, and to give a break-down of the component attributes of the water which comprise the sub-sections of the word. Hey, maybe I'll do this myself sometime: but give it a chance. EuroSong talk 22:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge —  per JChap2007 and Yomangani M  a  rtinp23  22:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect Yomangani is right, if someone types that in, they definitely deserve to have some info about it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leroyencyclopediabrown (talk • contribs) . Jaedza 05:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect per Yomangani. May be good idea to include a pronunciation key for it where ever it may end up. Jaedza 05:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge. Dictionary definition, notable word. --Gray Porpoise 16:15, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * zomg keep JayW 19:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as dicdef, neologism, something made up in school one day back in the 18th-Century. Not listed in the Oxford English Dictionary; the reference to the AskOxford website states the word is made-up, and not in common use, and refers to the invention of such words as a "common verbal game".  Yes, I see the irony in nominating a word invented in the 18th Century as neologism, but the fact someone has an old edition of the Guinness book is not a factor here.  Tychocat 10:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Longest word in English and redirect. --Zoz (t) 12:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks just plain bogus, and even if genuine should be superceded by supercalifragilisticexpialidocious ;-) Chris CII 13:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * "Long" words are not rare: for example, every single protein sequence has a very long systematic name that is no more, and no less, a legitimate English word than this word. If this word can be attested to as signficant by multiple reliable, verifiable sources, merge to Longest word in English and redirect: otherwise, delete. -- The Anome 13:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * delete : According to Oxford Dictionnary, this is not the longest word in English (they think that chemical particles doesn't count). Lucasbfr 13:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Yomangani. I think the fact that one dictionary doesn't count it isn't a reason to merge.  Daniel . Bryant  13:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.