Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aer Lingus Flight 110


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Aer Lingus Flight 110

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable aviation incident. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is really a textbook example of WP:NOTNEWS. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   13:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Aer Lingus. 178.94.165.139 (talk) 13:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a notable incident per WP:AIRCRASH. Also WP:NOTNEWS SempreVolando (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonnotable per WP:AIRCRASH and [[WP:NOTNEWS. Aircraft maintenance issue; no loss of life or loss of aircraft. Edison (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Especially considering the aircraft (EI-LBR), actually operated on behalf of Aer Lingus by a different airline and flight crew on a different AOC, was back in the air the following night and has operated no fewer than 14 subsequent flights without incident. Hardly a serious occurrence. SempreVolando (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete entireely non notable, no significant coverage. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As per other contributors. Aircraft suffered a mechanical fault, landed safely, was repaired and returned to service. Routine event, not in any way notable. Neiltonks (talk) 12:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge This article can probably be used in a merge in the Aer Lingus page as a written off accident. Adog104 (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Adog104
 * Comment But it isn't a written off accident. The aircraft is still flying....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:30, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As per other contributors. Let's hurry up and get this done. This isn't even a writeoff. Yny501 (talk) 08:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. The plane flew out the next morning! It just needed a minor repair. There was some potential that this might have become a major incident. But it didn't. No need for an article. oknazevad (talk) 13:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. As indicated by other editors, this incident does not have encyclopedic notability. -- Kinu  t/c 16:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable accident. Nothing special about it, no deaths or injuries etc. Myname is not dave (talk/contribs) 18:36, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as although interesting as it may be, there's not much here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete not really notable as shown above, not worth a mention in other articles either. MilborneOne (talk) 17:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not noticeable, only one minor injury doesn't make this article noticeable.--Planecrashexpert (talk) 08:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete per above - Non notable aircraft incident. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.