Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerial (Canadian band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 14:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Aerial (Canadian band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * The nominator does not describe what research was done in order to come to the conclusion that this band is "non-notable". As it turns out, with some brief searching I was able to find out that the band meets WP:BAND criterion #1, with coverage in such sources as Allmusic and the Canadian Pop Encyclopedia; and WP:BAND criterion #2 with a charted hit in Canada. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 00:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per inclusion of song "Easy Love" on notable chart (Canadian Top 40), meets WP:BAND criterion 2. (Re Paul Erik's sources above, I'm not now, and have never been, convinced that Allmusic falls within Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources or independent sources - but it doesn't matter here for the reasons above.) - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per DustFormsWords. Joe Chill (talk) 01:59, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.