Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerial servant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Aerial servant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Stub article about little-known fictional creature with no independent sources or indication of notability. Not a very active user (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Belongs on D&D wikia, not here - no assertion of real world significance, fails WP:NFICTION. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 11:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. Even a merge would be ill advised as the name is so vague. "Aerial servant" can describe thousands of video game monsters.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete (and restore redirect). created this page back in 2008 as a redirect to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, and I think that was the right call. The article is functionally redundant with the subject's entry in that index since the "references" in the article are largely the same internal wikilinks that appear in-line. —jameslucas  ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄  16:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - No real world notability, and no non-primary sources discussing the creature in any meaningful way. The proposed merge target suffers the same issues as the various other D&D monster lists currently at AFD, so I can't recommend any sort of merge or redirect to it. Rorshacma (talk) 16:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.