Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aero International (Regional)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Note that the nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet near the end of the AfD timeframe. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 07:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Aero International (Regional)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG  Jen yir e2  20:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Jen yir e2  20:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The companies who participated in the consortium are indisputably notable. There are references to the AI(R) consortium in several existing Wikipedia articles (see What Links Here) without explanation or context. If we were to make the history of the AI(R) consortium a section in the history of ATR, BAe Jetstream and BAe Regional/Avro, the same discussion would be repeated multiple times. More sources would be good and can be added over time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Foxworthy (talk • contribs) 06:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, per the cited WP:RS in the The Independent 1, and WSJ 23. SailingInABathTub (talk) 12:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.