Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aero Lloyd destinations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:54, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Aero Lloyd destinations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page is completely redundant as all the information contained on this page is already found in the page Aero Lloyd. It is not necessary to have a separate page repeating Aero Lloyd's former destinations — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firth m (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Refer to ANI Nominator has plagiarized (copyvio) User:Zaps93 and others with this edit and now wants to use AfD to hide the evidence.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The word(s) you're looking for are "copying without attribution", not "plagarism". Also please assume good faith. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * So just another fun day deleting the work of other editors and claiming it as your own and getting an administrator to defend your effort? You seem to think this is kiddie land.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
 * "The difference between the right word and the almost-right word is really quite important. It's the difference between the lightning and the lightning-bug". It isn't plagarism. I never said it wasn't copyvio. And if you had looked you would have noticed that I removed it from the article, not "defended" it. Next time double-check before accusing someone like that, please. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you don't understand the definition of the word "plagiarism", and also don't know how to spell it, maybe you should look it up. I suggest Merriam-Webster.  Unscintillating (talk) 07:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I entirely understand the definition of the word, and I also understand you've never made a typo. Seriously, please don't make personal attacks. Thanks. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Odd then how you made the same typo twice. And if you understand the word "plagiarism", then you should understand that I used the word correctly in my first post.  Do you have a problem with referring this incident to ANI?  Unscintillating (talk) 10:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * In the dictionary sense, yes. In the Wikipedia sense, I disagree. But there's no point in ANI-ing this argument over the use of two terms that, in this case, amount to "potayto" vs. "potahto" (the article is unsuitable, either way). - The Bushranger One ping only 00:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Aero Lloyd. Obvious WP:CFORK. Ajf773 (talk) 09:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, the 'fork' was due to copying without attribution, and has been removed from Aero Lloyd due to that. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a directory. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Aero Lloyd. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 17:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no need to merge this. Wikipedia is not a directory. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Lots of airlines have similar content to this. I wouldn't object to replacing the table with a summary of its contents, but I'm not going to do that work, and don't particularly expect anyone else to do so at this time. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * That's true, but that's not relevant to this article, and most of those - especially for defunct airlines - should probably have that trimmed as well. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is almost totally copied from . This is simply a replication of the last table of flight destinations on the official website. It is not a comprehensive list of destinations flown by this airline. Absolutely no need to merge.--DreamLinker (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:DIRECTORY. Indiscriminate collection of information and unneeded cross categorisation. There's nothing to merge and not suitable as a redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per The Bushranger, DreamLinker and K.e.Coffman. Retention does not aid understanding of the subject. YSSYguy (talk) 22:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.