Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter  (talk)  16:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Aeroford

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not of any significance. Read A7 Dusty777 (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * This is such a short stub that I'm just going to merge it into Ford Model T, where it is already mentioned. This stub doesn't provide a source but the equivalent page on de.wikipedia.org does.  So what I'm really saying is that there are alternatives to deletion, especially when sourced material can be transwikied. Several Times (talk) 18:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I won't object to either that or keeping. I've just added the ref that dewiki uses. Not often I find a better referencing situation on one of the other languages. Peridon (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The significance is that it was a make of automobile manufactured for five years. Google Books shows several references.  If automobile encyclopedias cover this car, Wikipedia should too.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  20:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Ford Model T as discussed above. Mangoe (talk) 22:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment If you merged it to Ford Model T, what would it contribute? Its a poorly written article & it has no significance. If you want to spend the time digging up facts on this car, feel free! I really don't think its worth it though. Dusty777 (talk) 01:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a minor car model, a Model T variant. Your appeal to A7 is misplaced given that the latter is specifically limited to a narrow range of subjects, into which I would not say that car models would fall. Mangoe (talk) 02:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * In what way is it poorly written? -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Poor writing is easily edited. In this case, it was edited after the merge.  Merging to a larger article makes sense when the smaller article remains undeveloped, as the smaller article is provided with context. Several Times (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. As a make and model of car, modified from another or not, just about falls above the notability threshhold in my opinion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to Ford Model T as discussed above. Let's not lose this tidbit of information, now that it has been gathered. TheAMmollusc (talk) 12:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I concur with Necrothesp's analysis. Also, being sold only in the UK, it could be considered as "swamped" by information if it was merged into the Model T's article. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.