Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerogryf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:12, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Aerogryf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a small airline operating on a non scheduled basis. The company has not been the subject of any significant coverage in reliable, independent media, thus failing WP:CORP. --FoxyOrange (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak support. One would think that all airlines would be notable, but upon second thought, I think nom is right. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 06:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete per nom. Aircraft operators are not intrinsically notable and must satisfy WP:CORP; this one doesn't. YSSYguy (talk) 04:28, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to have reliable coverage in accordance with WP:CORP, the only source I found was this trivial mention. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.