Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroklub Toužim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Toužim. The article's subject lacks the required notability for an independent article. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 09:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Aeroklub Toužim

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability from what I could see; however, most sources are Czech and I cannot read that language. Top results are the aeroclub's and the town's wepages. Tigraan (talk) 15:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Additional comment - this page was speedily deleted as WP:G11 a day ago, and the same user recreated it...
 * I did not see that when AfDing. The current version seems OK-ish to me in that respect, because "unambiguously promotional" is a high threshold to meet. Tigraan (talk) 16:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:13, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - does not meet the WP:GNG. It's a little club of 55 members based on a little grass airfield next to a little town of 3800 people, I doubt that there would be very much to find even in Czech, let alone in English. Mere existence is not enough to justify a WP article. YSSYguy (talk) 03:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Selective Merge to Toužim. The club has received some coverage (e.g. ), but does not appear to have received enough to qualify for a standalone article. The merge target article presently has no mention of this, so a merge will enhance it per WP:PRESERVE. North America1000 01:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment by nom - agreed. I do not like WP:GEOLAND; I do not think minor towns like Toužim should have an article in the first instance, but since the guideline mandates one, we can as well use it. Tigraan Click here to contact me 08:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 09:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete instead as I've been watching this and considered the merge but I frankly am not convinced for it. I would suggest redirect perhaps if needed though. SwisterTwister   talk  04:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.